Category Archives: SMILE

SMILE category

ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-07 Math, Spelling and Reading Program

Posted on 7th January 2022 by SMILE22_JulieLitob

ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-07

Date: January 7, 2022

To: SMILE Faculty, Grade 1 to Grade 10 Learners, and their Parents

From: The Administrator

Re: Math, Spelling and Reading Program

It has been noted by the Administration that the learners have not acquired the level of skills in Math, spelling, and reading that they had pre-pandemic. For this reason, we shall be commencing new academic programs this Third Quarter.

I. Effective the 2nd week of January, recorded weekly asynchronous performance tasks in Math and Spelling will be given in Grades 1 through 10. These are not related to the lessons in Math and English and are on top of asynchronous tasks in the said subjects.

A. Math Grades 4 to 10: These are exercises are 1 number for multiplication and 1 number for division. The answers will be hand-written on paper using a clear pen and the pictures for each item will be sent to the Math teacher through J2e no later than Monday 5:00 p.m. the following week.

Scoring rubrics for each item are as follows:

1 point for the correct solution,

1 point for the correct answer,

1 point for punctuality in the submission of the pictures through J2e

TOTAL = 3 points X 2 items = 6 points in Math performance task every week

B. Math Grade 3: These are games in J2Blast, particularly the practice test of TT Blast. The learner will play 1 game (either practice or test) every weekend as a practice in multiplication. He/She will save his/her score and share with the Math Teacher through J2e no later than Monday 5:00 p.m. the following week.

Scoring rubrics are as follows:

1 point for playing TT Blast over the weekend,

1 point for punctuality in the submission of the pictures through J2e

TOTAL = 2 points in Math performance task every week

C. Math Grade 1 and 2: These are games in J2Blast, particularly the practice test of SATs Blast (KS1 or KS2). The learner will play 1 game (either practice or test) every weekend as a practice in multiplication. . He/She will save his/her score and share with the Math Teacher through J2e no later than Monday 5:00 p.m. the following week.
Scoring rubrics are as follows:

1 point for playing TT Blast over the weekend,

1 point for punctuality in the submission of the pictures through J2e

TOTAL = 2 points in Math performance task every week

D. English Grades 1-10: These are games in J2Blast, particularly Spell Blast. The learner will play every weekend either 1 practice test (Grades 1-10) or 1 live contest (Grades 4-10 only) as a practice in spelling. He/She will save his/her score and share it with the English Teacher through J2e no later than Monday 5:00 p.m. the following week. The app itself will record the date and time submitted.

Scoring rubrics are as follows:

1 point for playing Spell Blast over the weekend,

1 point for punctuality in the submission of the pictures through J2e

TOTAL = 2 points in Math performance task every week

II. Effective the month of January, the SMILEmathics Club will be open to Mathematically-gifted learners in Grades 4-10. The meeting will be every Friday from 4:30-5:30 p.m.

III. It has been noted that no one submitted audition videos for the school play “Snow White”. We shall be making this a project of the new SMILE Theater Club. This club will be open to interested learners in Grades 4-10 who are good in oral reading and are also interested in acting or technology. The meeting will be every Saturday at 1:00-2:30 p.m.

Please be guided accordingly. God bless!

Mrs. Julie Anne Bajo-Litob

Copy furnished:

Teachers

KITE Academy / My School / Bulletin

Just2Easy / J2Webby / News

J2e Shared Files

Posted in GRADE 1 A, GRADE 1 B, GRADE 2 A, GRADE 2 B, GRADE 3 A, GRADE 3 B, GRADE 4 A, GRADE 4 B, GRADE 5 A, GRADE 6 B, GRADE 7, GRADE 9, News, SMILE, St. Aloysius, St. Augustine, St. Dominic, St. John Bosco, St. John Paul II, St. John the Evangel, St. Luke, St. Mark, St. Matthew, St. Mother Teresa, St. Nicholas, St. Pedro Calungsod, St. Therese, staff, Sts. Peter and Paul, Ven. Carlo | Leave a comment

ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-05

Posted on 14th October 2021 by SMILE22_JulieLitob

Date: October 14, 2021

To: SMILE Faculty, Pre-K to Grade 10 Learners, and their Parents

From: The Administrator

Re: Foundation Week 2021 Performance Tasks

Several collaborative tasks have been scheduled during the performance task week: Zumba in cosplay costume, Science Product Innovation Showdown (the revised title), and Rubik’s Cube Showdown. These have been published at the beginning of the school year through the Calendar of Activities.

In order to give clarity, consistency and efficiency in the scoring for the Zumba and Rubik’s Cube performance tasks, herewith are the Scoring Rubrics.

SCORING RUBRICS FOR ZUMBA

COLLABORATIVE PERFORMANCE TASK

MAPEH	15 points for Grades 1-10 for Participation in the Zumba Live Event
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point
A. Attendance	Learner was present during the whole Zumba event.	Learner was present during Zumba event but did not get to perform.	Learner was present during part of the Zumba event and did not get to perform.
B. Creative Skill	Learner executed the dance skillfully.	Learner executed the dance somewhat skillfully.	Learner lacked dancing skill.
C. Overall Presentation	Learner displayed confidence and looked good overall during the presentation.	Learner displayed some confidence and looked good overall during the presentation.	Learner showed lack of confidence during the presentation.
EPP/TLE	15 points for Grades 4-10 for the DIY Accessories/ Accent or Costume
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point

A. Materials	Materials were complete.	Most materials were present.	A few materials were present.
B. Effort	Learner did his/her best finish 50% of the DIY project.	Learner did his/her best finish some of the DIY project.	Learner exerted some effort to make the DIY project.
C. Attitude while working	Learner was joyful and enthusiastic the whole time while working.	Learner was joyful and enthusiastic most of the time while working.	Learner was grumbling and showed unhappiness while working.

Values	15 points for Grades 1-10 for Rehearsals
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point

A. Effort during practice #1	Learner did his utmost to master the steps and execute skillfully.	Learner did his utmost to master the steps and execute skillfully but inconsistently.	Learner exerted effort to practice.
B. Effort during practice #2	Learner did his utmost to master the steps and execute skillfully.	Learner did his utmost to master the steps and execute skillfully but inconsistently.	Learner exerted effort to practice.
C. Effort during practice #3	Learner did his utmost to master the steps and execute skillfully.	Learner did his utmost to master the steps and execute skillfully but inconsistently.	Learner exerted effort to practice.

SCORING RUBRICS FOR RUBIK’S CUBE SHOWDOWN

COLLABORATIVE PERFORMANCE TASK

MATH	15 points for Grades 1-10
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point
A. Material	Learner participated with his/her own Rubik’s cube.	Learner participated with his/her own Rubik’s cube.	Learner did not have a Rubik’s cube
B. Effort	Learner did his/her utmost in solving the Rubik’s Cube task as expected.	Learner exerted some effort in solving the Rubik’s Cube task as expected.	Learner did not exert effort in solving the Rubik’s Cube task.
C. Independence	Learner tried to do the Rubik’s cube task independently.	Learner tried to do the Rubik’s cube task independently most of the time.	Learner was helped in doing the Rubik’s Cube task most of the time.
SCIENCE	15 points for Grade 3
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 11-15 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 6-10 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-5 points
Critical thinking	Learner successfully and patiently completed the required task to a large extent.	Learner successfully and patiently completed the required task to some extent.	Learner patiently tried to do the required task but succeeded only a little bit.

Please be guided accordingly. God bless!

Mrs. Julie Anne Bajo-Litob

Copy furnished:

Teachers

KITE Academy / My School / Bulletin

Just2Easy / J2Webby / News

J2e Shared Files

Posted in GRADE 1 A, GRADE 1 B, GRADE 2 A, GRADE 2 B, GRADE 3 A, GRADE 3 B, GRADE 4 A, GRADE 4 B, GRADE 5 A, GRADE 6 B, GRADE 7, GRADE 9, Holy Archangels, KINDER A, KINDER B, News, PRE-K, SMILE, SMILE 2021, St. Aloysius, St. Augustine, St. Dominic, St. John Bosco, St. John Paul II, St. John the Evangel, St. Luke, St. Mark, St. Matthew, St. Mother Teresa, St. Nicholas, St. Pedro Calungsod, St. Therese, staff, Sts. Peter and Paul, Ven. Carlo | Leave a comment

Reminder on ID picture

Posted on 22nd September 2021 by SMILE22_JulieLitob

September 22, 2021

Hello, dear SMILE Parents in Pre-K to Junior High School! Praised be Jesus Christ!

The ID maker really needs your child’s picture already. Kindly send a soft copy of your child’s picture (head to chest shot) to the Class Adviser through Messenger until Friday, September 24. Please write your child’s FULL NAME and GRADE LEVEL to facilitate forwarding to the Cashier. The background is preferably but not necessarily white. Do please let your child wear a decent top (blouse or sleeved t-shirt).

Please disregard this announcement if you have submitted your child’s picture upon enrollment.

May I also remind the parents of Grades 1-3 learners to practice your children in manipulating J2e5. Some learners had difficulty typing words, embedding the voice clip and drawing/ attaching pictures during the simulation/ practice tests.

Thank you and God bless your family po. Please stay safe and continue to pray to the Lord unceasingly.

Very truly,
Teacher Julie

Posted in GRADE 1 A, GRADE 1 B, GRADE 2 A, GRADE 2 B, GRADE 3 A, GRADE 3 B, GRADE 4 A, GRADE 5 A, GRADE 6 B, GRADE 7, GRADE 9, Holy Archangels, KINDER A, KINDER B, News, PARENT CLASS, PRE-K, SMILE, SMILE 2021, St. Aloysius, St. Augustine, St. Dominic, St. John Bosco, St. John Paul II, St. John the Evangel, St. Luke, St. Mark, St. Matthew, St. Mother Teresa, St. Nicholas, St. Pedro Calungsod, St. Therese, staff, Sts. Peter and Paul, Ven. Carlo | Leave a comment

ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-04 Grades 4-10 Science Project Collaborative Performance Task and Science Product Innovation Proposal Collaborative performance Task

Posted on 3rd September 2021 by SMILE22_JulieLitob

ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-04

Date: September 3, 2021

To: All Grade 4-10 SMILE Faculty, Learners and their Parents

From: The Administrator

Re: Grades 4-10 Science Project Collaborative Performance Task and Science Product Innovation Proposal Collaborative performance Task

The SELECTION FOR BEST SCIENCE PROJECT is an annual competition in SMILE. This year, it will be held during Foundation Week. The said competition has no bearing on the grade. Only one awardee shall be selected for the Intermediate Category and only one awardee shall be selected for the High School Category. The basis for selection of the finalists is the score for the SMILExploration performance task in Science subject.

In the time of pandemic, the goal of SMILExploration performance task is for learners to engage in hands-on projects related to their lessons for the quarter, to enjoy opportunities to observe, ask questions, gather data, make conclusions, and then to present to others through a video whatever the process they went through as well whatever they learned in the process of doing science. For lack of time this school year, no technical paper is required.

The learners will be given a general topic based on which they can choose a project to make or investigate and then present through a video. Submission of the video of each learner’s performance task is not later than September 24, 2021. The said ONE PERFORMANCE TASK will be submitted to and scored by the teachers in Science, EPP / TLE, MAPEH, and Values subjects for the First Quarter.

The SCIENCE PRODUCT INNOVATION PROPOSAL SHOWDOWN is an exhibit of SMILE learners’ own ideas on new products or on innovations to existing products that will be for the good of mankind at some point in the future. There will be no actual product, but rather just purely ideas. This is because the showdown aims to develop creative thinking and communication skills among the learners. This is the first time that SMILE have this event. It is for all Grades 4-10 learners only. Written proposal and video of the presentation will be submitted to and scored in Science, Araling Panlipunan, English and Filipino subjects for the Second Quarter.

In order to give clarity, consistency and efficiency in the scoring for the two aforementioned performance tasks, herewith are the Scoring Rubrics. This supersedes Policy Memo Number 1 Scoring Rubrics for SMILExploration.

SCORING RUBRICS FOR SCIENCE PROJECT COLLABORATIVE PERFORMANCE TASK

SCIENCE	25 points for Grades 4-10 for the Project Presentation
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point
A. Relevance	Project itself is relevant to the topic given beforehand. It answers a question or need.	Project itself is relevant to the topic given beforehand.	Project itself is not relevant to the topic given beforehand.
B. Materials	All materials needed were brought for the demonstration.	Most materials needed were brought for the demonstration	Many necessary materials were lacking.
C. Procedure	There was a thorough preparation of the procedure. Procedure done was clear, logical and orderly	There was enough preparation of the procedure.	Some important steps were missing in the demonstration or the steps were not clear to the audience.
D. Evidence of Understanding	The learner showed during the presentation that he/she clearly understood what the project was trying to ask, show and prove.	The learner showed during the presentation that he/she somehow understood what the project was trying to ask, show or prove.	During the presentation, the learner did not show that he/she somehow understood what the project was trying to ask, show or prove.
E. Independence	There is evidence that the work was done by the himself/herself with some help. He/She was seen and heard in all parts of the video.	There is evidence that the work was done by the himself/herself. He/She was seen and heard in some but not in all parts of the video.	There is doubt that the work was done by the learner himself/herself. He/She could not be seen or heard in the video.
MAPEH	10 points for Grades 4-10 for the Demonstration
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point
A. Physical Presence	Body language showed confidence and compelling stage presence Concentration was clear. Eye contact with virtual audience was engaging.	Comfortable, confident body language	Timid or stiff, unsure Body language reflected nervousness
B. Mastery	The speaker memorized the whole speech and skillfully executed the demonstration.	The speaker memorized most of the speech and actions. He/She was able to demonstrate satisfactorily.	The speaker did not memorize most of the speech or was disorganized in his/her demonstration.
EPP/TLE	20 points for Grades 4-10 for the Final Video
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point

A. Quality of Video	Video project felt/ appeared that a lot of effort was exerted into making it.	Video project felt/ appeared that some effort was exerted into making it.	Video project felt/ appeared dissatisfactory, like very little or no effort was exerted into making it.
B. Vocal Clarity	Voice of the learner was very clear and crisp. .	Most words were clearly uttered.	Many words were mumbled.
C. Volume	Volume of the learner speaking was appropriate.	Volume was mostly appropriate.	Volume was too soft or too loud.
D. Punctuality	Project was submitted on time.	Project was submitted 1-6 days after the deadline	Project was submitted 7 or more days after the deadline

Values	10 points for Grades 4-10 for Effort and Respect
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point

A. Effort to Do Science	Project concept showed evidence that this was meticulously thought about and was at par with the learner’s level of ability.	Project concept showed evidence that this was given some scientific thought.	Project submitted showed that there was only minimal planning or seemed too easy for the learner’s level of ability.
B. Respect	Learner manifested respect in presenting to his/her audience.	Learner generally manifested respect in speaking with his/her audience.	Learner did not manifest respect in speaking with the audience.

SCORING RUBRICS FOR SCIENCE PRODUCT INNOVATION PROPOSAL COLLABORATIVE PERFORMANCE TASK

SCIENCE	15 points for Grades 4-10 for the Proposed Innovation and Participation
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point
A. Relevance	Proposed product innovation has to do with Science or Technology.	Proposed product innovation has to do with Araling Panlipunan.	Proposed product innovation is related to another academic subject.
B. Creativity	Proposed product innovation is unique and creative.	Proposed product innovation is creative.	Proposed product innovation is not interesting at all.
B. Participation	The learner participated in the virtual showdown.		The learner did not participate in the virtual showdown.
ARALING PANLIPUNAN	15 points for Grades 4-10 for the Potential of the Proposed Innovation
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point
A. Usefulness	As seen in the video, the proposed product innovation answers a real need of mankind.	As seen in the video, the proposed product innovation may answer a need of mankind.	The proposed product innovation does not seem like it can answer a need of mankind.
B. Impact	As seen in the video, the proposed product innovation can really help or benefit a lot of people at present or in the future.	As seen in the video, the proposed product innovation can help or benefit some people at present or in the future.	The proposed product innovation may help or benefit only very few people at present or in the future.
C. Acceptance	As presented in the video, the proposed product innovation can possibly gain acceptance by a lot of people.	The proposed product innovation can possibly gain acceptance by some people.	The proposed product innovation may not gain acceptance by people.
FILIPINO	15 points for Grades 1-10 for the Verbal Communication Skill
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point
A. Physical Presence	As seen in the video, body language showed confidence and compelling stage presence Concentration was clear. Eye contact with virtual audience was engaging.	Comfortable, confident body language	Timid or stiff, unsure Body language reflected nervousness
B. Mastery	As seen in the video, the speaker memorized the whole speech and skillfully executed the demonstration.	The speaker memorized most of the speech and actions. He/She was able to demonstrate satisfactorily.	The speaker did not memorize most of the speech or was disorganized in his/her demonstration..
C. Enthusiasm	In delivering his/ her speech, the speaker showed enthusiasm for his/her proposed innovation.	In delivering his/ her speech, the speaker showed some enthusiasm for his/her proposed innovation.	The speaker did not show enthusiasm or interest for his/her proposed innovation.
ENGLISH	10 points for Grades 1-10 for the Written Proposal
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point
A. Content	The written proposal indicates clearly the purpose for the proposed innovation, and explains well what the project actually is.	The written proposal indicates somewhat clearly the purpose for the proposed innovation, and explains what the project actually is.	The written proposal fails to indicate one or both criteria.
B. Clarity of Idea	The written proposal includes a clear drawing or video of the proposed innovation. The learner shows evidence that he/she can actually picture out what he/she wants to make in the future.	The written proposal includes a drawing or video of the proposed innovation. The learner shows evidence that he/she can somehow picture out what he/she wants to make in the future.	The written proposal does not include a drawing or video of the proposed innovation.

Please be guided accordingly.

Mrs. Julie Anne Bajo-Litob

Copy furnished:

Subject teachers

KITE Academy / My School / Bulletin

Just2Easy / J2Webby / News

Posted in GRADE 1 A, GRADE 1 B, GRADE 2 A, GRADE 2 B, GRADE 3 A, GRADE 4 A, GRADE 7, GRADE 9, News, SMILE, St. Aloysius, St. Augustine, St. Dominic, St. John Bosco, St. John Paul II, St. John the Evangel, St. Luke, St. Mark, St. Matthew, St. Mother Teresa, St. Pedro Calungsod, St. Therese, staff, Sts. Peter and Paul, Ven. Carlo | Leave a comment

ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-03 Public Speaking Collaborative Performance Task

Posted on 3rd September 2021 by SMILE22_JulieLitob

ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-03

Date: September 3, 2021

To: All Grade 1-10 SMILE Faculty, Learners and their Parents

From: The Administrator

Re: Public Speaking Collaborative Performance Task

The selection for Best in Public Speaking Awardee is an annual competition in SMILE. This year, it will be held during Foundation Week. The criteria are based largely on the criteria used during DAPRISA public speaking contest.

The following are the categories / genre:
Grade 1- Poem Recitation;
Grade 2- Storytelling;
Grade 3- Declamation;
Grade 4- Oration;
Grade 5- Interpretive Reading (final piece will be deployed on October 14);
Grade 6- Creative Story Re-telling (final piece will be deployed on October 14);
Junior High School- Extemporaneous Preaching (final Bible passage which is the basis for the extemporaneous persuasive preaching will be deployed on October 14). Only one learner in the Junior High School Department will receive the Best in Extemporaneous Preaching Award.

The said competition has no bearing on the grade. However, the basis for selection of the finalists is the combined score for the SMILExpress Yourself performance task in English and Filipino subjects.

For the SMILExpress Yourself performance task, the learners will be given more than a month to read and practice the piece synchronously with their classmates, but they have to master it by themselves. Grades 5-10 learners will be given a practice piece but their final piece will be given 4 days before the deadline for the performance task. Submission of the video of each learner’s performance task in all levels is not later than October 18, 2021. The said ONE PERFORMANCE TASK will be submitted to and scored by the teachers in English, Filipino, MAPEH, and Values subjects for the Second Quarter.

In order to give clarity, consistency and efficiency in the scoring for the SMILExpress Yourself PT asynchronous collaborative performance task in public speaking, herewith are the Scoring Rubrics:

ENGLISH	20 points for Grades 1-10 for the Performance
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point
A. Intonation	Intonation is skillful.	Intonation is correct.	Tone is unnatural, inappropriate, boring or monotonous.
B. Pace	Pace is skillful.	Pace is correct.	Pacing is uneven and does not contribute to the audience’s understanding of the piece.
C. Articulation	Enunciation and pronunciation are correct.	Enunciation and pronunciation are mostly correct.	Enunciation and pronunciation need much improvement.
D. Evidence of Understanding	Masterfully interprets the piece/ Bible passage for the audience, deftly revealing its meaning.	Conveys meaning of the piece/ Bible passage well	Obscures meaning of the piece/ Bible passage.
FILIPINO	20 points for Grades 1-10 for the Performance
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point
A. Physical Presence	Body language shows confidence and compelling stage presence Concentration is clear. Eye contact with virtual audience is engaging.	Comfortable, confident body language	Timid or stiff, unsure Body language reflects nervousness
B. Mastery	The speaker memorized the whole piece and skillfully executed the actions. For Grade 5: The speaker did not get lost in reading after looking at the camera. For Grade 6: The speaker perfectly recalled the main characters, beginning, conflict and end of the story. For High School: The speaker masterfully developed the content of the speech / preaching.	The speaker memorized most of the piece and actions. For Grade 5: The speaker got lost in reading after looking at the camera only a few times. For Grade 6: The speaker recalled most of the main characters, beginning, conflict and end of the story. For High School: The speaker developed the content of the speech / preaching.	The speaker did not memorize most of the piece or did not have appropriate gestures. For Grade 5: The speaker got lost in reading after looking at the camera too many times. For Grade 6: The speaker recalled at least one: main characters, beginning, conflict and end of the story. For High School: The speaker was unable to develop the content of the speech / preaching.
C. Dramatic Appropriateness of Delivery (face and body)	Non-verbal communication style reflects internalization of the piece All gestures and movements serve to clarify the meaning of the text. If dialogue is employed, characters are believable to listener. The natural voice is differentiated from character voices. The speaker maintains clear spatial relationships for the characters and narrator, if any.	Literary piece/ preaching is enhanced by style of delivery – any gesture, facial expression and movement are appropriate to the piece. Characterization is appropriately done through voice and spatial relationship but it is not consistent.	The piece/ preaching is overshadowed by significant distracting gestures, facial expressions, inflections or accents. Delivery was not appropriate to the genre or piece (over or under-emoting).
D. Overall Performance in Public Speaking	Over-all performance was captivating and masterful. The piece / preaching was presented efficiently and keeps listeners’ interest throughout. Performance / preaching was convincing.	Sufficient recitation or oral delivery; Lacks meaningful impact on the audience	Ineffective or inappropriate recitation/ preaching
MAPEH	20 points for Grades 1-10 for the Final Video
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point

A. Quality of Video	Video project was excellent and was skillfully done	Video project was satisfactory	Video project felt/ appeared dissatisfactory
B. Vocal Clarity	Voice was very clear and crisp. .	Most words were clearly uttered.	Many words were mumbled.
C. Volume	Volume was appropriate.	Volume was mostly appropriate.	Volume was too soft or too loud.
D. Punctuality	Project was submitted on time	Project was submitted 1-6 days after the deadline	Project was submitted 7 or more days after the deadline

Values	20 points for Grades 1-10 for the Rehearsals
	ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points	AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points	BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point

A. Effort	Project submitted shows evidence that this was meticulously done and was the learner’s best work	Project submitted shows that there was some effort.	Project submitted shows that there was only minimal planning and effort.
B. Cooperation during Rehearsal #1	Learner participated actively during the graded rehearsal	Learner participated during the graded rehearsal	Learner did not participate during the graded rehearsal
C. Cooperation during Rehearsal #2	Learner participated actively during the graded rehearsal	Learner participated during the graded rehearsal	Learner did not participate during the graded rehearsal
D. Cooperation during Rehearsal #3	Learner participated actively during the graded rehearsal	Learner participated during the graded rehearsal	Learner did not participate during the graded rehearsal