-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Teacher Sarah on Sample voting (dry run for SSG)
- T.Annje on Sample voting (dry run for SSG)
Archives
Category Archives: News
SCHOOL-LIFE BALANCE
March 9, 2022
Dear SMILE parents,
Praised be Jesus Christ!
It has been noted that there has been a lot of pressure on everyone in the school community lately. In order to promote school-life balance for both learners and teachers, SMILE is adopting the following measures:
- FOR KINDER TO GRADE 10: Certain Thursdays and Fridays will be wellness days. Essentially, we will be going back to the 4-day virtual synchronous meetings between learners and teachers. The Class Advisers will advise you within each week whether the wellness day falls on a Thursday or Friday. These shall coincide with schedules of performance tasks, written tasks, and post-exam rest.
- FOR GRADES 4-10 ONLY: Required (graded) written tasks about 2 weeks topics will be only once monthly. The adjusted rubrics are as follows and will also be formally stated in a memo soon:
- 5 points- Submitted proof of accomplishment of the required asynchronous activity on time, and there is evidence of extra care and effort in performing the task;
- 4 points- Submitted proof of accomplishment of the required asynchronous activity on time, and there is evidence of some care and effort in performing the task;
- 3 points- Submitted proof of accomplishment of the required asynchronous activity on time;
- 2 points- Submitted proof of accomplishment of the required asynchronous activity but late by 2 weeks;
- 1 point- Submitted proof of accomplishment of the required asynchronous activity but late by 4 weeks;
- 0 point- Submitted proof of accomplishment of the required asynchronous activity but late by more than 4 weeks, or did not submit at all
- FOR GRADES 1-10: There will be only a minimum of 4 performance tasks for each quarter. These may be oral, live, or asynchronous.
- FOR GRADES 1-10: except for the required written tasks or performance tasks, weekly assignments in all subjects will only be for the learners’ own improvement.
- FOR TOMORROW, March 10, ONLY THE FOLLOWING periods will have synchronous meetings between teachers and learners:
8:30 am
9:30 am
10:30 am
11:30 am
12:30 pm
1:30 pm
2:30 pm
3:30 pm
4:30 pm
5:30 pm
6:30 pm
7:30 pm
- FOR THIS FRIDAY, March 11 only – Wellness Friday. There will be no classes in Kinder to Grade 10. Please let the children finish whatever Performance Task is due next week or Written Task they have not yet submitted this week.
Thanks so much po. God bless everyone!
Very truly,
Teacher Julie Anne Litob
Posted in News
Leave a comment
POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-08 Incentives for the SMILE Representatives to Sanctioned Interschool Competitions
Date: February 3, 2022
To: All Grade 1-10 SMILE Faculty, Learners and their Parents
From: The Administrator
Re: Incentives for the SMILE Representatives to Sanctioned Interschool Competitions
In order to give incentive to the future participants of Interschool Competitions, hereunder is a list of additional academic points that learners may garner for various levels in Grade School and High School.
The Academic Coordinator and the Administrator shall agree and direct the teachers during a meeting as to what month the additional points shall be applied in the said subject or subjects. Contestants who did not exert satisfactory effort in preparing for the interschool competition will not gain the additional points.
Please be guided accordingly.
Mrs. Julie Anne Bajo-Litob
Copy furnished:
Subject teachers
mCourser My School
J2 Webby News
J2e shared files: From the Administrator
ADDITIONAL ACADEMIC POINTS for DAPRISA Acad Fest (Junior High School Math-Sci) and Other Interschool Math-Sci Contests:
- 2 ADDITIONAL POINTS written task (monthly test) in Math and Science in the month of the competition for exerting satisfactory effort during the contest preparation
- 3 ADDITIONAL POINTS performance task in Math and Science in the applicable quarter for winning Champion / First Place
- 2 ADDITIONAL POINTS performance task in Math and Science in the applicable quarter for winning First Runner-up / Second Place
- 1 ADDITIONAL POINT performance task in Math and Science in the applicable quarter for winning Second Runner-up / Third Place
ADDITIONAL ACADEMIC POINTS for DAPRISA Acad Fest (Elementary Spelling) and Other Interschool Spelling Contests:
- 2 ADDITIONAL POINTS written task (monthly test) in English and Filipino in the month of the competition for exerting satisfactory effort during the contest preparation
- 3 ADDITIONAL POINTS performance task in Spelling and Filipino in the applicable quarter for winning Champion / First Place
- 2 ADDITIONAL POINTS performance task in Spelling and Filipino in the applicable quarter for winning First Runner-up / Second Place
- 1 ADDITIONAL POINT performance task in Spelling and Filipino in the applicable quarter for winning Second Runner-up / Third Place
ADDITIONAL ACADEMIC POINTS for DAPRISA Litfest and Other Interschool Public Speaking Contests:
- 2 ADDITIONAL POINTS written task (monthly test) in English and MAPEH in the month of the competition for exerting satisfactory effort during the contest preparation
- 3 ADDITIONAL POINTS performance task in English and MAPEH in the applicable quarter for winning Champion / First Place
- 2 ADDITIONAL POINTS performance task in English and MAPEH in the applicable quarter for winning First Runner-up / Second Place
- 1 ADDITIONAL POINT performance task in English and MAPEH in the applicable quarter for winning Second Runner-up / Third Place
ADDITIONAL ACADEMIC POINTS for DAPRISA High School Musical Fest (Dance, Vocal Solo, Vocal Solo with Self-Accompaniment:
- 2 ADDITIONAL POINTS written task (monthly test) in MAPEH in the months of February and March for exerting satisfactory effort during the contest preparation
- 3 ADDITIONAL POINTS performance task in MAPEH in the months of February and March for winning Champion / First Place
- 2 ADDITIONAL POINTS performance task in MAPEH in the months of February and March for winning First Runner-up / Second Place
- 1 ADDITIONAL POINT performance task in MAPEH in the months of February and March for winning Second Runner-up, Third Runner-Up, and Fourth Runner-Up (Third to Fifth Place)
Posted in News
Leave a comment
ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-07 Math, Spelling and Reading Program
ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-07
Date: January 7, 2022
To: SMILE Faculty, Grade 1 to Grade 10 Learners, and their Parents
From: The Administrator
Re: Math, Spelling and Reading Program
It has been noted by the Administration that the learners have not acquired the level of skills in Math, spelling, and reading that they had pre-pandemic. For this reason, we shall be commencing new academic programs this Third Quarter.
I. Effective the 2nd week of January, recorded weekly asynchronous performance tasks in Math and Spelling will be given in Grades 1 through 10. These are not related to the lessons in Math and English and are on top of asynchronous tasks in the said subjects.
A. Math Grades 4 to 10: These are exercises are 1 number for multiplication and 1 number for division. The answers will be hand-written on paper using a clear pen and the pictures for each item will be sent to the Math teacher through J2e no later than Monday 5:00 p.m. the following week.
Scoring rubrics for each item are as follows:
1 point for the correct solution,
1 point for the correct answer,
1 point for punctuality in the submission of the pictures through J2e
TOTAL = 3 points X 2 items = 6 points in Math performance task every week
B. Math Grade 3: These are games in J2Blast, particularly the practice test of TT Blast. The learner will play 1 game (either practice or test) every weekend as a practice in multiplication. He/She will save his/her score and share with the Math Teacher through J2e no later than Monday 5:00 p.m. the following week.
Scoring rubrics are as follows:
1 point for playing TT Blast over the weekend,
1 point for punctuality in the submission of the pictures through J2e
TOTAL = 2 points in Math performance task every week
C. Math Grade 1 and 2: These are games in J2Blast, particularly the practice test of SATs Blast (KS1 or KS2). The learner will play 1 game (either practice or test) every weekend as a practice in multiplication. . He/She will save his/her score and share with the Math Teacher through J2e no later than Monday 5:00 p.m. the following week.
Scoring rubrics are as follows:
1 point for playing TT Blast over the weekend,
1 point for punctuality in the submission of the pictures through J2e
TOTAL = 2 points in Math performance task every week
D. English Grades 1-10: These are games in J2Blast, particularly Spell Blast. The learner will play every weekend either 1 practice test (Grades 1-10) or 1 live contest (Grades 4-10 only) as a practice in spelling. He/She will save his/her score and share it with the English Teacher through J2e no later than Monday 5:00 p.m. the following week. The app itself will record the date and time submitted.
Scoring rubrics are as follows:
1 point for playing Spell Blast over the weekend,
1 point for punctuality in the submission of the pictures through J2e
TOTAL = 2 points in Math performance task every week
II. Effective the month of January, the SMILEmathics Club will be open to Mathematically-gifted learners in Grades 4-10. The meeting will be every Friday from 4:30-5:30 p.m.
III. It has been noted that no one submitted audition videos for the school play “Snow White”. We shall be making this a project of the new SMILE Theater Club. This club will be open to interested learners in Grades 4-10 who are good in oral reading and are also interested in acting or technology. The meeting will be every Saturday at 1:00-2:30 p.m.
Please be guided accordingly. God bless!
Mrs. Julie Anne Bajo-Litob
Copy furnished:
Teachers
KITE Academy / My School / Bulletin
Just2Easy / J2Webby / News
J2e Shared Files
Posted in GRADE 1 A, GRADE 1 B, GRADE 2 A, GRADE 2 B, GRADE 3 A, GRADE 3 B, GRADE 4 A, GRADE 4 B, GRADE 5 A, GRADE 6 B, GRADE 7, GRADE 9, News, SMILE, St. Aloysius, St. Augustine, St. Dominic, St. John Bosco, St. John Paul II, St. John the Evangel, St. Luke, St. Mark, St. Matthew, St. Mother Teresa, St. Nicholas, St. Pedro Calungsod, St. Therese, staff, Sts. Peter and Paul, Ven. Carlo
Leave a comment
ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-05
Date: October 14, 2021
To: SMILE Faculty, Pre-K to Grade 10 Learners, and their Parents
From: The Administrator
Re: Foundation Week 2021 Performance Tasks
Several collaborative tasks have been scheduled during the performance task week: Zumba in cosplay costume, Science Product Innovation Showdown (the revised title), and Rubik’s Cube Showdown. These have been published at the beginning of the school year through the Calendar of Activities.
In order to give clarity, consistency and efficiency in the scoring for the Zumba and Rubik’s Cube performance tasks, herewith are the Scoring Rubrics.
SCORING RUBRICS FOR ZUMBA
COLLABORATIVE PERFORMANCE TASK
MAPEH | 15 points for Grades 1-10 for Participation in the Zumba Live Event | ||
ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points | AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point | |
A. Attendance | Learner was present during the whole Zumba event. | Learner was present during Zumba event but did not get to perform. | Learner was present during part of the Zumba event and did not get to perform. |
B. Creative Skill | Learner executed the dance skillfully. | Learner executed the dance somewhat skillfully. | Learner lacked dancing skill. |
C. Overall Presentation | Learner displayed confidence and looked good overall during the presentation. | Learner displayed some confidence and looked good overall during the presentation. | Learner showed lack of confidence during the presentation. |
EPP/TLE | 15 points for Grades 4-10 for the DIY Accessories/ Accent or Costume | ||
ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points | AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point |
A. Materials | Materials were complete. | Most materials were present. | A few materials were present. |
B. Effort | Learner did his/her best finish 50% of the DIY project. | Learner did his/her best finish some of the DIY project. | Learner exerted some effort to make the DIY project. |
C. Attitude while working | Learner was joyful and enthusiastic the whole time while working. | Learner was joyful and enthusiastic most of the time while working. | Learner was grumbling and showed unhappiness while working. |
Values | 15 points for Grades 1-10 for Rehearsals | ||
ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points | AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point |
A. Effort during practice #1 | Learner did his utmost to master the steps and execute skillfully. | Learner did his utmost to master the steps and execute skillfully but inconsistently. | Learner exerted effort to practice. |
B. Effort during practice #2 | Learner did his utmost to master the steps and execute skillfully. | Learner did his utmost to master the steps and execute skillfully but inconsistently. | Learner exerted effort to practice. |
C. Effort during practice #3 | Learner did his utmost to master the steps and execute skillfully. | Learner did his utmost to master the steps and execute skillfully but inconsistently. | Learner exerted effort to practice. |
SCORING RUBRICS FOR RUBIK’S CUBE SHOWDOWN
COLLABORATIVE PERFORMANCE TASK
MATH | 15 points for Grades 1-10 | ||
ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points | AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point | |
A. Material | Learner participated with his/her own Rubik’s cube. | Learner participated with his/her own Rubik’s cube. | Learner did not have a Rubik’s cube |
B. Effort | Learner did his/her utmost in solving the Rubik’s Cube task as expected. | Learner exerted some effort in solving the Rubik’s Cube task as expected. | Learner did not exert effort in solving the Rubik’s Cube task. |
C. Independence | Learner tried to do the Rubik’s cube task independently. | Learner tried to do the Rubik’s cube task independently most of the time. | Learner was helped in doing the Rubik’s Cube task most of the time. |
SCIENCE | 15 points for Grade 3 | ||
ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 11-15 points | AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 6-10 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-5 points | |
Critical thinking | Learner successfully and patiently completed the required task to a large extent. | Learner successfully and patiently completed the required task to some extent. | Learner patiently tried to do the required task but succeeded only a little bit. |
Please be guided accordingly. God bless!
Mrs. Julie Anne Bajo-Litob
Copy furnished:
Teachers
KITE Academy / My School / Bulletin
Just2Easy / J2Webby / News
J2e Shared Files
Posted in GRADE 1 A, GRADE 1 B, GRADE 2 A, GRADE 2 B, GRADE 3 A, GRADE 3 B, GRADE 4 A, GRADE 4 B, GRADE 5 A, GRADE 6 B, GRADE 7, GRADE 9, Holy Archangels, KINDER A, KINDER B, News, PRE-K, SMILE, SMILE 2021, St. Aloysius, St. Augustine, St. Dominic, St. John Bosco, St. John Paul II, St. John the Evangel, St. Luke, St. Mark, St. Matthew, St. Mother Teresa, St. Nicholas, St. Pedro Calungsod, St. Therese, staff, Sts. Peter and Paul, Ven. Carlo
Leave a comment
Reminder on ID picture
September 22, 2021
Hello, dear SMILE Parents in Pre-K to Junior High School! Praised be Jesus Christ!
The ID maker really needs your child’s picture already. Kindly send a soft copy of your child’s picture (head to chest shot) to the Class Adviser through Messenger until Friday, September 24. Please write your child’s FULL NAME and GRADE LEVEL to facilitate forwarding to the Cashier. The background is preferably but not necessarily white. Do please let your child wear a decent top (blouse or sleeved t-shirt).
Please disregard this announcement if you have submitted your child’s picture upon enrollment.
May I also remind the parents of Grades 1-3 learners to practice your children in manipulating J2e5. Some learners had difficulty typing words, embedding the voice clip and drawing/ attaching pictures during the simulation/ practice tests.
Thank you and God bless your family po. Please stay safe and continue to pray to the Lord unceasingly.
Very truly,
Teacher Julie
Posted in GRADE 1 A, GRADE 1 B, GRADE 2 A, GRADE 2 B, GRADE 3 A, GRADE 3 B, GRADE 4 A, GRADE 5 A, GRADE 6 B, GRADE 7, GRADE 9, Holy Archangels, KINDER A, KINDER B, News, PARENT CLASS, PRE-K, SMILE, SMILE 2021, St. Aloysius, St. Augustine, St. Dominic, St. John Bosco, St. John Paul II, St. John the Evangel, St. Luke, St. Mark, St. Matthew, St. Mother Teresa, St. Nicholas, St. Pedro Calungsod, St. Therese, staff, Sts. Peter and Paul, Ven. Carlo
Leave a comment
ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-04 Grades 4-10 Science Project Collaborative Performance Task and Science Product Innovation Proposal Collaborative performance Task
ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-04
Date: September 3, 2021
To: All Grade 4-10 SMILE Faculty, Learners and their Parents
From: The Administrator
Re: Grades 4-10 Science Project Collaborative Performance Task and Science Product Innovation Proposal Collaborative performance Task
The SELECTION FOR BEST SCIENCE PROJECT is an annual competition in SMILE. This year, it will be held during Foundation Week. The said competition has no bearing on the grade. Only one awardee shall be selected for the Intermediate Category and only one awardee shall be selected for the High School Category. The basis for selection of the finalists is the score for the SMILExploration performance task in Science subject.
In the time of pandemic, the goal of SMILExploration performance task is for learners to engage in hands-on projects related to their lessons for the quarter, to enjoy opportunities to observe, ask questions, gather data, make conclusions, and then to present to others through a video whatever the process they went through as well whatever they learned in the process of doing science. For lack of time this school year, no technical paper is required.
The learners will be given a general topic based on which they can choose a project to make or investigate and then present through a video. Submission of the video of each learner’s performance task is not later than September 24, 2021. The said ONE PERFORMANCE TASK will be submitted to and scored by the teachers in Science, EPP / TLE, MAPEH, and Values subjects for the First Quarter.
The SCIENCE PRODUCT INNOVATION PROPOSAL SHOWDOWN is an exhibit of SMILE learners’ own ideas on new products or on innovations to existing products that will be for the good of mankind at some point in the future. There will be no actual product, but rather just purely ideas. This is because the showdown aims to develop creative thinking and communication skills among the learners. This is the first time that SMILE have this event. It is for all Grades 4-10 learners only. Written proposal and video of the presentation will be submitted to and scored in Science, Araling Panlipunan, English and Filipino subjects for the Second Quarter.
In order to give clarity, consistency and efficiency in the scoring for the two aforementioned performance tasks, herewith are the Scoring Rubrics. This supersedes Policy Memo Number 1 Scoring Rubrics for SMILExploration.
SCORING RUBRICS FOR SCIENCE PROJECT COLLABORATIVE PERFORMANCE TASK
SCIENCE | 25 points for Grades 4-10 for the Project Presentation | ||
ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points | AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point | |
A. Relevance | Project itself is relevant to the topic given beforehand.
It answers a question or need. |
Project itself is relevant to the topic given beforehand. | Project itself is not relevant to the topic given beforehand. |
B. Materials | All materials needed were brought for the demonstration. | Most materials needed were brought for the demonstration | Many necessary materials were lacking. |
C. Procedure | There was a thorough preparation of the procedure.
Procedure done was clear, logical and orderly |
There was enough preparation of the procedure.
|
Some important steps were missing in the demonstration or the steps were not clear to the audience. |
D. Evidence of Understanding | The learner showed during the presentation that he/she clearly understood what the project was trying to ask, show and prove. | The learner showed during the presentation that he/she somehow understood what the project was trying to ask, show or prove. | During the presentation, the learner did not show that he/she somehow understood what the project was trying to ask, show or prove. |
E. Independence | There is evidence that the work was done by the himself/herself with some help.
He/She was seen and heard in all parts of the video. |
There is evidence that the work was done by the himself/herself.
He/She was seen and heard in some but not in all parts of the video. |
There is doubt that the work was done by the learner himself/herself.
He/She could not be seen or heard in the video.
|
MAPEH | 10 points for Grades 4-10 for the Demonstration | ||
ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points | AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point | |
A. Physical Presence | Body language showed confidence and compelling stage presence
Concentration was clear. Eye contact with virtual audience was engaging. |
Comfortable, confident body language | Timid or stiff, unsure
Body language reflected nervousness |
B. Mastery | The speaker memorized the whole speech and skillfully executed the demonstration. | The speaker memorized most of the speech and actions. He/She was able to demonstrate satisfactorily. | The speaker did not memorize most of the speech or was disorganized in his/her demonstration. |
EPP/TLE | 20 points for Grades 4-10 for the Final Video | ||
ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points | AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point |
A. Quality of Video | Video project felt/ appeared that a lot of effort was exerted into making it. | Video project felt/ appeared that some effort was exerted into making it. | Video project felt/ appeared dissatisfactory, like very little or no effort was exerted into making it. |
B. Vocal Clarity | Voice of the learner was very clear and crisp.
. |
Most words were clearly uttered. | Many words were mumbled. |
C. Volume | Volume of the learner speaking was appropriate. | Volume was mostly appropriate. | Volume was too soft or too loud. |
D. Punctuality | Project was submitted on time. | Project was submitted 1-6 days after the deadline | Project was submitted 7 or more days after the deadline |
Values | 10 points for Grades 4-10 for Effort and Respect | ||
ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points | AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point |
A. Effort to Do Science | Project concept showed evidence that this was meticulously thought about and was at par with the learner’s level of ability. | Project concept showed evidence that this was given some scientific thought. | Project submitted showed that there was only minimal planning or seemed too easy for the learner’s level of ability. |
B. Respect | Learner manifested respect in presenting to his/her audience. | Learner generally manifested respect in speaking with his/her audience. | Learner did not manifest respect in speaking with the audience. |
SCORING RUBRICS FOR SCIENCE PRODUCT INNOVATION PROPOSAL COLLABORATIVE PERFORMANCE TASK
SCIENCE | 15 points for Grades 4-10 for the Proposed Innovation and Participation | ||
ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points | AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point | |
A. Relevance | Proposed product innovation has to do with Science or Technology. | Proposed product innovation has to do with Araling Panlipunan. | Proposed product innovation is related to another academic subject. |
B. Creativity | Proposed product innovation is unique and creative. | Proposed product innovation is creative. | Proposed product innovation is not interesting at all. |
B. Participation | The learner participated in the virtual showdown. | The learner did not participate in the virtual showdown. | |
ARALING PANLIPUNAN | 15 points for Grades 4-10 for the Potential of the Proposed Innovation
|
||
ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points | AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point | |
A. Usefulness | As seen in the video, the proposed product innovation answers a real need of mankind. | As seen in the video, the proposed product innovation may answer a need of mankind. | The proposed product innovation does not seem like it can answer a need of mankind. |
B. Impact | As seen in the video, the proposed product innovation can really help or benefit a lot of people at present or in the future. | As seen in the video, the proposed product innovation can help or benefit some people at present or in the future. | The proposed product innovation may help or benefit only very few people at present or in the future. |
C. Acceptance | As presented in the video, the proposed product innovation can possibly gain acceptance by a lot of people. | The proposed product innovation can possibly gain acceptance by some people. | The proposed product innovation may not gain acceptance by people. |
FILIPINO | 15 points for Grades 1-10 for the Verbal Communication Skill | ||
ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points | AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point | |
A. Physical Presence | As seen in the video, body language showed confidence and compelling stage presence
Concentration was clear. Eye contact with virtual audience was engaging. |
Comfortable, confident body language | Timid or stiff, unsure
Body language reflected nervousness |
B. Mastery | As seen in the video, the speaker memorized the whole speech and skillfully executed the demonstration. | The speaker memorized most of the speech and actions. He/She was able to demonstrate satisfactorily. | The speaker did not memorize most of the speech or was disorganized in his/her demonstration.. |
C. Enthusiasm | In delivering his/ her speech, the speaker showed enthusiasm for his/her proposed innovation.
|
In delivering his/ her speech, the speaker showed some enthusiasm for his/her proposed innovation. | The speaker did not show enthusiasm or interest for his/her proposed innovation.
|
ENGLISH | 10 points for Grades 1-10 for the Written Proposal | ||
ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 4-5 points | AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point | |
A. Content | The written proposal indicates clearly the purpose for the proposed innovation, and explains well what the project actually is. | The written proposal indicates somewhat clearly the purpose for the proposed innovation, and explains what the project actually is. | The written proposal fails to indicate one or both criteria. |
B. Clarity of Idea | The written proposal includes a clear drawing or video of the proposed innovation.
The learner shows evidence that he/she can actually picture out what he/she wants to make in the future. |
The written proposal includes a drawing or video of the proposed innovation.
The learner shows evidence that he/she can somehow picture out what he/she wants to make in the future. |
The written proposal does not include a drawing or video of the proposed innovation. |
Please be guided accordingly.
Mrs. Julie Anne Bajo-Litob
Copy furnished:
Subject teachers
KITE Academy / My School / Bulletin
Just2Easy / J2Webby / News
Posted in GRADE 1 A, GRADE 1 B, GRADE 2 A, GRADE 2 B, GRADE 3 A, GRADE 4 A, GRADE 7, GRADE 9, News, SMILE, St. Aloysius, St. Augustine, St. Dominic, St. John Bosco, St. John Paul II, St. John the Evangel, St. Luke, St. Mark, St. Matthew, St. Mother Teresa, St. Pedro Calungsod, St. Therese, staff, Sts. Peter and Paul, Ven. Carlo
Leave a comment
ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-02 Scoring Rubrics for Live or Collaborative Performance Tasks Part 1; Releasing of Enrollment Contract
ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-02
Date: August 24, 2021
To: All Grade 1-10 SMILE Faculty, Learners and their Parents
From: The Administrator
Re: Scoring Rubrics for Live or Collaborative Performance Tasks Part 1 ; Releasing of Enrollment Contract
Please be informed that Parent’s Copy of the notarized Enrollment Contract is available at the school. Please ask for it from the Registrar.
The Memos on Scoring of Performance Tasks further clarify the Rules and Regulations as well as the Academic Policies spelled out in the Student Handbook. The said document was published during Orientation and Acquaintance Weeks in the Homeroom Group Chats. It was also published today in J2Webby News. Please click the News tab of the learner’s account in order to access it.
Live, Time-Bound or Individual Assessments are more reliable measurement of a learner’s academic progress in each subject area. Many times during the school year, certain activities or projects are done, and because they are tedious to make, the learners are tasked to make one project but graded in several subjects.
In order to give more clarity, consistency and efficiency on the scoring for some live, time-bound or collaborative Performance Tasks for School Year 2021-2022, the following are the scoring rubrics for various tasks applicable for most subjects. Teachers may adjust the weight depending on the grade level and the difficulty of the task.
Learners who enrolled for Module Type of Learning or those who have been diagnosed with learning disability will please ask for an appointment with me through the Class Adviser not later than August 24, 2021. Otherwise, all these rubrics as well as all other academic policies shall be applied.
Please be guided accordingly.
Mrs. Julie Anne Bajo-Litob
Copy furnished:
Subject teachers
mCourser My School Bulletin Board
J2 Webby News
SCORING RUBRICS FOR LIVE, TIME-BOUND PERFORMANCE TASK
- READING WORDS ORALLY: 5 points per word (1 point each for the following) –
honest effort in reading was evident,
word was read correctly,
word was read correctly within 5 seconds,
word was read independently,
word was clearly enunciated (consideration is given to sudden connectivity problem)
- READING SENTENCES ORALLY: 5 points per sentence (1 point each for the following) –
honest effort in reading was evident,
all words were read correctly,
sentence was read automatically without hesitation,
sentence was read with expression within 5 seconds,
sentence was read independently
- READING PASSAGES ORALLY: 10-20 points depending on the number of questions
5 points per passage (1 point each for the following) –
honest effort in reading was evident,
all words were read correctly,
passage was read automatically without hesitation,
passage was read with expression within time limit,
passage was read independently
5 points per follow-up question (1 point each for the following) –
effort to answer the question was evident,
answer was correct,
explanation was relevant,
explanation was complete,
answer was given independently
- SPELLING WRITTEN TEST: 4-5 points per word (1 point each for the following) –
honest effort in spelling was evident,
word was spelled correctly,
word was spelled within 1 minute,
word was spelled independently
(if whiteboard was required for the performance task: word was legible enough to be read by the teacher)
- MATH PROBLEM SOLVING WRITTEN TEST: 6 points per item (1 point each for the following) –
honest effort in solving was evident,
final answer was correct,
solution was correct,
problem was solved within 5 minutes,
the answer was submitted within the time limit,
answer was done independently,
- MATH ORAL TEST: 5 points per item (1 point each for the following) –
honest effort in reciting the times table was evident,
times table was recited correctly within the (30 seconds to 1-minute) time limit,
the recitation was done automatically,
the recitation was completed without mistakes,
the recitation was done independently
- SUPPLY THE ANSWER ORAL TEST: 5-7 points per item (1 point each for the following) –
honest effort in answering was evident,
the given answer was relevant to the question / topic,
the given answer was correct,
the answer was given within the (30 seconds to 1-minute) time limit,
the answer was given independently
(if explanation was required: the explanation was correct,
the explanation was complete)
- EXPLAIN YOUR ANSWER WRITTEN TEST: 7 points per item (1 point each for the following) –
honest effort in answering was evident,
the given answer was correct,
the given explanation was relevant to the question / topic,
the explanation was complete,
the explanation was logical,
the answer was submitted within the time limit,
the answer was given independently
- GRAPHIC ORGANIZER / SUMMARY / OUTLINE WRITTEN TEST: 7 points per item (1 point each for the following) –
honest effort in answering was evident,
the content showed correct understanding of the topic,
the content was thorough or complete,
the ideas showed the ability to make correct connections,
the organizer/ summary/ outline had the correct format,
the paper was submitted within the time limit,
the answer was written independently
- CREATING / COMPOSING WRITTEN TEST: 7 points per item (1 point each for the following) –
honest effort in answering was evident,
the content showed correct understanding of the topic,
the content was thorough or complete,
the ideas showed the ability to make correct connections and make something creative from the things learned about the topic ,
the creative work had the correct format,
the paper was submitted within the time limit,
the answer was written independently
SCORING RUBRICS FOR COLLABORATIVE PERFORMANCE TASK
PARTICIPATION DURING REHEARSALS / PREPARATION PHASE –
10-20 points in VALUES
ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 3-5 points | AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 1-2 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0 point | |
Effort every practice X # of rehearsals / preparatory phases | Performance every rehearsal / each preparatory phase was well-done done and was the learner’s best work | Performance every rehearsal / preparatory phase showed that there was some effort. | Performance every rehearsal showed that there was only minimal planning / effort. |
Cooperation during Rehearsal | Learner participated actively during the graded rehearsal | Learner participated during the graded rehearsal | Learner did not participate during the graded rehearsal |
Posted in News
Leave a comment
ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-01 Scoring Rubrics for Non-Live or Non Time-Bound Performance Tasks Part 1
ONLINE SCHOOL POLICY MEMORANDUM NO. 2021-01
Date: August 20, 2021
To: All Grade 1-10 SMILE Faculty, Learners and their Parents
From: The Administrator
Re: Scoring Rubrics for Non-Live or Non Time-Bound Performance Tasks Part 1
In order to give more clarity, consistency and efficiency on the scoring for some non-live or non time-bound Performance Tasks for School Year 2021-2022, the following are the scoring rubrics for various tasks applicable for most subjects. Teachers may adjust the weight depending on the grade level and the difficulty of the task.
Learners who enrolled for Module Type of Learning or those who have been diagnosed with learning disability will please ask for an appointment with me through the Class Adviser not later than August 24, 2021. Otherwise, all these rubrics as well as all other academic policies stated in the Student Handbook shall be applied.
Please be guided accordingly.
Mrs. Julie Anne Bajo-Litob
Copy furnished:
Subject teachers
mCourser My School Bulleting Board
J2 Webby News
SCORING RUBRICS FOR NON-LIVE OR NON-TIME-BOUND
PERFORMANCE TASK
- FRIENDLY LETTER / BUSINESS LETTER – 21 points
AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS –
0-1 point |
|
A. Date | Correct date is present & in the correct place | The date is present but not in the correct place. |
B. Greeting | A proper greeting is used in the correct place.
Names are capitalized. Comma after the name. |
Missing 2 components
|
C. Body | The letter is in a logical order, uses effective transitions and makes sense. | Missing 2 or more components. |
D. Conventions – capitalization, punctuation, spelling, penmanship | Capital letters are used at the beginning of all sentence and in all proper nouns.
Punctuations are always correctly used. Correct spelling is used most of the time. |
Capital letters are sometimes used at the beginning of sentence and in proper nouns.
Correct punctuation is used some of the time. There are many spelling errors. |
E. Closing | Proper closing is included and in proper place.
Comma is included after closing and before the name. |
Missing 2 or more components. |
F. Originality | There is evidence that the work is originated and written by the pupil himself/herself with some help. | There is doubt that the work was done by the pupil himself/herself. |
G. Punctuality | Project was passed on time. | Project is 7 or more days late. |
- ESSAY / REFLECTION OR REACTION PAPER / BLOG / REVIEW / COMPOSITION – 21 points
AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS –
0-1 point |
|
A. Content | The content is relevant to the theme / topic all throughout.
Ideas are clearly stated and supported with details, facts and examples. All the ideas make sense. |
The content is somewhat related to the theme and the ideas make some sense. |
B. Organization & Format | Information is arranged in a way that makes sense, with similar ideas grouped together in the beginning, middle and end.
Transition words are used to smoothly, logically and cohesively move to the next sentence and paragraph. If applicable: The given template or format was accurately followed. |
Missing 2 or more components.
|
C. Style | The first sentence grabs the reader’s attention. The last sentence leaves a strong final impression.
The first paragraph provides an overview of the topic and gives a clue as to what the essay will be about. The conclusion reminds readers of the main points of the essay / paper without repeating everything and does not give new information. The style in writing is interesting. Modifiers, conjunctions, prepositions, transition words and complex sentences are used to make writing interesting. Writes in complete sentences. Correctly uses subject and verb in each sentence. |
Missing 2 or more components.
|
D. Conventions – Grammar, Vocabulary, Fluency | Capital letters are used at the beginning of all sentence and in all proper nouns.
Punctuations are always correctly used. There are relatively few or minor spelling and grammatical errors. There is accurate use of relatively complex words and sentences. |
There are many errors in capitalization, punctuation, spelling and grammar.
There is no mastery in the use of simple sentences. |
E. Presentation | The work is neat.
Margins and spacing are appropriate. |
Missing 2 or more components.
|
F. Originality | There is evidence that the work is originated and written by the pupil himself/herself with some help. | There is doubt that the work was done by the pupil himself/herself.
|
G. Punctuality | Project was passed on time. | Project is 7 or more days late. |
- WRITING POETRY / STORY – 21 points
AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS –
0-1 point |
||
A. Meaning | Piece is creatively and carefully written to effectively express ideas and emotions into words.
The meaning is clear. |
The piece’s meaning is not clear. | |
B. Sensory Details and Form | The poem or story is alive because of vivid images and intensely felt emotion.
The form is complete and follows its intended form/ style. |
Piece does not feel alive or the form is not as intended.
|
|
C. Word Choice | Words chosen are appropriate.
The words are written in a way to make writing interesting. |
Word choice does not contribute much to make the piece interesting.
|
|
D. Neatness | Final output is neat.
There is appropriate spacing. |
Missing 1 component
|
|
E. Process | There is very significant improvement from the first draft to the final submitted work in terms of capitalization, punctuation, spelling, style. | There is very little improvement from the first draft to the final submitted work. Final work is not satisfactory. | |
F. Originality | There is evidence that the work is originated and written by the pupil himself/herself with some help. | There is doubt that the work was done by the pupil himself/herself.
|
|
G. Punctuality | Project was passed on time. | Project is 7 or more days late. |
- COLLAGE / POSTER / MAP/ COMIC STRIP / DIGITAL ART PROJECT – 21 points
AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS –
0-1 point |
|
A. Creativity | Unique, detailed, interesting, original ideas | Missing 2 components |
B. Craftsmanship | Neat, careful, clean, consistent | Missing 2 components |
C. Effect | Colorful, nice, meaningful, balanced, solid, appropriate, filled the given space appropriately | Missing 2 components |
D. Originality and Effort | Shows evidence that the work is originated and made by the pupil himself/herself with some help,
Shows evidence that this was meticulously done and was the learner’s best work |
There is evidence that this was done with much help from someone else.
Artwork shows that there was only little planning and thoroughness done for the design. |
E. Accuracy and Completeness | All of the information given are accurate.
Requirements and directions were followed. All of the assigned work is complete. |
Few required content are included in a meaningful way.
Some requirements and directions were not followed. |
F. Originality | There is evidence that the work is originated and written by the pupil himself/herself with some help. | There is doubt that the work was done by the pupil himself/herself.
|
G. Punctuality | Project was passed on time. | Project is 7 or more days late. |
- VIDEO PROJECT / VLOG / PRESENTATION – 24 points
AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 0-1 point | |
A. Relevance | Project content was relevant to the given topic.
Only appropriate and facts relevant to the topic were presented. Enough descriptive details were presented to support main ideas and themes. Includes properly cited sources. |
Missing 2 components
|
B. Presenter | The presenter exhibited readiness, confidence and mastery of the presentation. | Missing 1 component
|
C. Content | The content was compelling, purposeful and clear. | Missing 2 components
|
D. Details | A rich variety of supporting information in the video contributed to the understanding the project’s main idea.
Everything required in presentation were included. |
Missing 1 component
|
E. Organization | Events and messages were presented in a logical order. | Missing 1 component
|
F. Creativity and Craftsmanship | Video project was well-produced.
Project was catchy and appropriate. Over-all effect was interesting and memorable. |
Missing 2 components
|
G. Time Factor | Time allotment was met.
Time was well-organized; no part of the project was rushed, too short or too long. |
Missing 1 component
|
H. Punctuality | Project was passed on time. | Project is 7 or more days late. |
- ROLE PLAY, DRAMA, DANCE OR SONG PRESENTATION – 21 points
AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS –
0-1 point |
|
A. Audience Impact / Stage Presence | Was aware and well-connected to the audience
Great use of gestures, facial expression & body movement |
No audience awareness or connection at all
Contained little to no facial expression, gesture or movement |
B. Blocking | Good use of stage and movement—did not turn back to audience | Must concentrate on facing forward |
C. Mastery / Memorization | Lines/song/ dance sequence was almost fully memorized.
Some improvisation used to make up for missed lines. |
Presentation was not at all memorized; no improvisation was used.
There are many mistakes in the performance. |
D. Creativity / Skill | Skillful performance so the message is conveyed well
Masterful performance! |
The performance was not skillful.
The message was not clearly understood. |
E. Costume | Costume is neat and appropriate. | Missing 1 component
|
F. Overall Presentation | Captivating, memorable and impressive over-all performance | Presentation needs a lot of improvement
|
G. Attendance | Actually performed
|
Did not perform or was very late
|
- SCIENCE PROJECT (SMILExploration Science project and report) – 30 points
AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2-3 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS –
0-1 point |
||
A. Relevance | Project itself is relevant to the topic given beforehand. | Project itself is not relevant to the topic given beforehand. | |
B. Usefulness | The experiment answers a real question or need | The experiment does not answer a question or need | |
C. Presentation | Experimenter was organized and obviously prepared for the demonstration
There was obvious meticulous preparation for the experiment presentation |
Experiment done was disorganized
There was lack of preparation for the experiment preparation. |
|
D. Materials | All materials needed were brought for the demonstration | Several materials listed in the report were not brought for the demonstration | |
E. Procedure | There was a thorough preparation of the procedure
Procedure done was clear, logical and orderly |
Some important steps were missing in either the report or the demonstration | |
F. Complete Written Report | Written report is complete: problem, hypothesis, materials, procedure, results and analysis | Missing 2 components | |
G. Accurate Written Report | Report is accurate | Report is not so accurate | |
H. Evaluation/ Conclusions | The conclusions drawn from the experiment were logical, clear, concise and answered the problem statement | Missing 2 components | |
I. Originality | There is evidence that the work is originated and written by the pupil himself/herself with some help. | There is doubt that the work was done by the pupil himself/herself.
|
|
J. Punctuality | Project was passed on time. | Project is 7 or more days late. |
- VIDEO PRODUCTION (EPP/ TLE SMILExploration) – 24 points
AT GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 2 points | BELOW GRADE LEVEL SKILLS – 1 point | ||
A. Subject | The subject for the video was interesting, educational and discussed thoroughly | Missing 1 component | |
B. Content | Everything that was presented in the video was relevant to the subject or topic | Some elements in the video had nothing to do with the subject being experimented on / shown | |
C. Presentation | Presentation of information was clear and interesting | Missing 1 component | |
D. Technical Aspects | Subject being experimented on was lit and clearly visible
Sound was clear and understandable Camera was stable |
Missing 1 component | |
E. Presenter | The presenter was seen at least at the beginning and at the end of the video
The presenter looked neat, comfortable and confident |
Missing 1 component | |
F. Creativity and Craftsmanship | Video project was well-produced.
Over-all effect was interesting and memorable. |
Missing 1 component | |
G. Time Factor | Time allotment was met.
Time was well-organized; no part of the project was rushed, too short or too long. |
Missing 1 component
|
|
H. Punctuality | Project was passed on time. | Project is 7 or more days late. | |
Posted in News
Leave a comment